 tarfeef101
|
2a375043c3
less header margin than before
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
650eaf5a2e
let's see
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
749679d3eb
title wasn't working out
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
8c1fa80ef0
god this is a pain
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
f740026330
new graphs seem to exist
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
2b34916035
hopefully no overlaps now
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
e7917eb875
hopefully titles are at the top now
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
fad8a2044e
did i do it?
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
10ae15493a
hopefully some nice graphs now
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
e7b7044dad
axes were cluttered, fixed
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
d7bfb3fc42
updated graph to use relative quality and not cost
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
dd7a56e57c
adjusted numbering for x-axis labels (how many cities in the problem) to reflect 14-16 instead of 0-2
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
bdd2527eb7
removing unneeded legends
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
5c4c8b62b6
new graphs?
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
f3d991bee6
hopefully axes?
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
37424e9c32
rows instead of columns
|
6 years ago |
|
tarfeef101
|
b679dfd1dd
first graph generated, lets see how it looks
|
6 years ago |
