Lossless compression based on a variation of tries

= 68bdd910c5 Confirmed that my print is superior, but found a print bug that's not yet solved 6 years ago
.nfs0000000003fe627900002241 d217a4d0cb Removed debug lines from print method 7 years ago
README.md 1bf738f6ef Created a README 6 years ago
a.out 68bdd910c5 Confirmed that my print is superior, but found a print bug that's not yet solved 6 years ago
source1.h 68bdd910c5 Confirmed that my print is superior, but found a print bug that's not yet solved 6 years ago
source2.h 68bdd910c5 Confirmed that my print is superior, but found a print bug that's not yet solved 6 years ago
test.cc 68bdd910c5 Confirmed that my print is superior, but found a print bug that's not yet solved 6 years ago
test.exe 3e05f3520a i fixed all the things :) 6 years ago
test.o 68bdd910c5 Confirmed that my print is superior, but found a print bug that's not yet solved 6 years ago
test.obj 3e05f3520a i fixed all the things :) 6 years ago

README.md

Triehard-Library

A simple library for Triehards, a variation on a compressed binary trie.

Compared to Patricia Tries, these tries do not store "compressed" substrings as the full length of the non-shared part. These take an entirely different approach. Since patricia tries take non-shared substrings and just store them in one node, they reduce the number of nodes, but not storage space. This also means searching them takes, one average, log (m) (where m is height of the tree) plus k, where k is the length of the string since a full comparison still occurs.

On the other hand, triehards compress by reducing the actual amount of data being stored. Each node has a pointer to its children (as usual), a flag to indicate if a stored value ends there (as usual), and a magnitude. This magnitude represents the amount of repeat digits represented by this node. So, if we have a string 11011110, there are 4 nodes, of magnitudes 2, 1, 4, and 1, respectively. This allows for compression based on repeat digits, without increasing the size (each node is of constant size, and there are less nodes than the total length of all strings when compression is possible). This makes the storage overhead lower than O(n) where n is the length of all strings.

As for searching, these retain the same efficiency as a standard trie O(k), compared to the longer search times of patricia tries. Since the compression is based on repeat digits instead of unshared substrings, this allows for standard searching to still occur.